The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful sports betting.
No, they weren't personally in presence, but the world-famous celebs were notably included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes casinos - the controversial websites providing both totally free casino-style games and lucrative prizes, such as cash, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'play for complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.
The sites are just two cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now finds itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of numerous video gaming corporations, not to mention suit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos function as traditional casinos, just without the oversight, customer defenses and tax laws. So not just can they prevent the high 24-percent federal sports betting levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulative hurdles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.
One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in income in 2015 alone. Now the company faces allegations of prohibited sports betting in a New york city suit that declares VGW utilizes star endorsers to 'develop a veneer of authenticity' around its product. (See VGW's statement below)
'I'm not exactly sure" if you don't trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies operating multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.
Sweepstakes endorsers include a variety of celebs from gambling enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom provide any differences between traditional sports betting and sweepstakes play.
Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of many sweepstakes casinos discovered online
Ryan Seacrest advises fans to play at Chumba Casino, where many - however not all - video games are complimentary
Drake has an offer with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he regularly touts on social networks
Find out more
Donald Trump 'set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'
Instead, advertisements normally focus around the social aspect of the gambling establishments, while leaving out the capacity for actual sports betting losses.
Others lure customers with pledges of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks advertisement showing off Drake's automobiles, airplanes and estates before rotating to video footage of the rapper playing online casino-style games.
'Daddy, why do we have so much money?' read the first caption on the screen.
Another caption described: 'Because I never provided up.'
The discrepancy in between sports betting sites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit complicated, however operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the former.
A representative for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competition with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, many of the players on social-sweepstakes casinos are sports betting free.
'Most social sweeps consumers never purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the typical deposit or bet size at real-money online gaming sites.'
Social casinos offer customers a possibility to play casino-style video games with friends. Players have the choice to purchase worthless currency often described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine money, however can be used to open various features within the video games.
But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes video gaming, enabling clients to acquire other currency called 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other rewards.
And therein lies the capacity for financial losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One player informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the past year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of money and other things of worth.
The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Global Poker occasion
Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an ad revealing off Drake's cars and trucks, airplanes and mansions
Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker
Traditional online gambling establishments are banned in all but seven states, which has actually helped to sustain the popularity of sweepstakes casinos.
Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which do not need usually need recognition. However, sites like Chumba will ask for IDs from gamers attempting to withdraw any funds.
Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow customers to send mail-in ask for free sweeps coins, provided the players follow painfully specific instructions. What's more, gamers are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins just for signing up, therefore providing a factor to try their hands at any number of casino games for an opportunity to win - or lose - real money.
So why are sweepstakes websites enabled to run in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all however 7?
According to the stakeholders, their item is the totally free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is merely a method of promoting their bread and butter.
'Social sweepstakes video games are just a form of online home entertainment,' an SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is needed to dip into social gambling establishments with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never have to spend for a chance to win rewards. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is a vital distinction in between social sweeps and traditional online sports betting sites like gambling establishments.'
Think of the method that McDonald's uses its yearly Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, however rather they're buying hamburgers and french fries that use them the possibility to win rewarding prizes, such as a $1 million jackpot.
And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the video game itself doesn't satisfy the meaning of gaming in the US.
'Sweepstakes are an enduring approach for promoting all type of daily services in the United States, whatever from burgers to publication memberships to coffee and home enhancement shops,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are routinely used by a who's who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'
But to numerous sports betting market insiders, that argument doesn't cut it.
For starters, video gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald's Monopoly video game does not run indefinitely. Rather, it has a well-defined beginning and end, consequently suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote real products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.
'They don't last permanently and they're usually not connected to casino-style video games of opportunity,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're simply cash free gifts.
'The sweepstakes [casinos] have none of the characteristics frequently associated with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes casinos use" casino-like" payouts, typically 80 percent or more of profits, whereas the typical payout percentage for a short-lived advertising sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the revenue earned by the business [generally less than one percent]'
Wallach is quick to compare the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the web cafes that sprang up in Florida, offering consumers the chance to play casino-style video games for genuine prizes. Many of those brick-and-mortar facilities have actually because been shuttered over claims of illegal sports betting.
DJ Khaled is amongst a number of celeb spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name
Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments ought to face comparable examination.
'These differences are not approximate,' Wallach said of social sweeps casinos. 'They have actually repeatedly been pointed out by courts and state lawyer generals as key aspects in determining that a sweepstakes promo was in reality a guise for unlawful gaming.'
Among the gambling establishment market's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing legislators to examine sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact new legislation on the issue.
'Consumers are being denied of securities and states are forgoing substantial tax and earnings opportunities as this gaming changes that conducted through managed channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.
And after that there are the plaintiffs who have sued social gambling establishments in more than a lots states.
Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 separate cases in Kentucky without admitting any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW concurred to pay $11.75 million in one class-action claim, stating the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued lawsuits.
Michael Phelps has signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker
In the most recent lawsuit, which is mainly similar to its predecessors, New york city state citizens Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'illegal sports betting enterprise. '
Apple and Google have actually likewise been named as defendants in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business responded to DailyMail.com's request for remark.
'We normally do not talk about matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson informed DailyMail.com by means of email. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has only simply been filed with the court and VGW has not been officially served.
'We have complete confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we run, and remain positive about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to offer our free-to-play games across the majority of North America, as we have for more than a decade, producing not just fantastic games, user experiences and entertainment, but likewise ensuring this is done securely, responsibly and at the highest level of standards.
'More broadly, we 'd repeat that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are reasonably common throughout the online social games industry (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we intend to intensely protect any claim which may be brought versus us.'
The concerns in between standard online gambling and sweepstakes casinos might prove problematic for some celeb endorsers.
Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with traditional gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.
'It's ironic that professional athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting 'sweeps' sites while at the same time the leagues wish to forecast a strong position against illegal gaming - especially when trying to tamp down the occasional gaming scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.
It was simply 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a lifetime restriction from the NBA over claims he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.
In addition to VGW, Apple and Google are being taken legal action against for hosting allegedly prohibited sports betting sites
Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a major issue for leagues such as the NBA.
'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on athletes backing sweepstakes sites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser included.
Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the players' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise overlooked to react to DailyMail.com e-mails.
Asked if their celebrity endorsers have a responsibility to explain to customers the differences and resemblances between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.
'We have full confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our business practices more broadly,' the spokesperson stated. 'Some of our values are" our players come initially" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of whatever we do.'
Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things in a different way.
'Celebrities who provide their names to dubious unlawful sports betting websites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at risk along with courting civil and class actions by customers who declare harm,' Glaser stated. 'There is likewise some threat that state regulators and state attorneys basic rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with prohibited gaming.'
New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton
